12 research outputs found

    The Escherichia coli Serogroup O1 and O2 Lipopolysaccharides Are Encoded by Multiple O-antigen Gene Clusters

    Get PDF
    Escherichia coli strains belonging to serogroups O1 and O2 are frequently associated with human infections, especially extra-intestinal infections such as bloodstream infections or urinary tract infections. These strains can be associated with a large array of flagellar antigens. Because of their frequency and clinical importance, a reliable detection of E. coli O1 and O2 strains and also the frequently associated K1 capsule is important for diagnosis and source attribution of E. coli infections in humans and animals. By sequencing the O-antigen clusters of various O1 and O2 strains we showed that the serogroups O1 and O2 are encoded by different sets of O-antigen encoding genes and identified potentially new O-groups. We developed qPCR- assays to detect the various O1 and O2 variants and the K1-encoding gene. These qPCR assays proved to be 100% sensitive and 100% specific and could be valuable tools for the investigations of zoonotic and food-borne infection of humans with O1 and O2 extra-intestinal (ExPEC) or Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) strains

    Reconstruction of ancestral chromosome architecture and gene repertoire reveals principles of genome evolution in a model yeast genus

    No full text
    International audienceReconstructing genome history is complex but necessary to reveal quantitative principles governing genome evolution. Such reconstruction requires recapitulating into a single evolutionary framework the evolution of genome architecture and gene repertoire. Here, we reconstructed the genome history of the genus Lachancea that appeared to cover a continuous evolutionary range from closely related to more diverged yeast species. Our approach integrated the generation of a high-quality genome data set; the development of AnChro, a new algorithm for reconstructing ancestral genome architecture; and a comprehensive analysis of gene repertoire evolution. We found that the ancestral genome of the genus Lachancea contained eight chromosomes and about 5173 protein-coding genes. Moreover, we characterized 24 horizontal gene transfers and 159 putative gene creation events that punctuated species diversification. We retraced all chromosomal rearrangements, including gene losses, gene duplications, chromosomal inversions and translocations at single gene resolution. Gene duplications outnumbered losses and balanced rearrangements with 1503, 929, and 423 events, respectively. Gene content variations between extant species are mainly driven by differential gene losses, while gene duplications remained globally constant in all lineages. Remarkably, we discovered that balanced chromosomal rearrangements could be responsible for up to 14% of all gene losses by disrupting genes at their breakpoints. Finally, we found that nonsynonymous substitutions reached fixation at a coordinated pace with chromosomal inversions, translocations, and duplications, but not deletions. Overall, we provide a granular view of genome evolution within an entire eukaryotic genus, linking gene content, chromosome rearrangements , and protein divergence into a single evolutionary framework

    Phenotypic impact of chromosomal rearrangements and evolution of yeast genomes

    No full text
    Nous avons cherchĂ© Ă  Ă©valuer l’impact des rĂ©arrangements chromosomiques sur l’évolution des gĂ©nomes de levures selon deux approches. La premiĂšre approche a consistĂ© Ă  retracer les rĂ©arrangements chromosomiques au cours de l’évolution des Saccharomycotina. Nous avons construit un arbre phylogĂ©nĂ©tique Ă  partir de 66 gĂ©nomes issus de bases de donnĂ©es publiques et reconstruit la structure des gĂ©nomes ancestraux des 66 espĂšces. La comparaison des gĂ©nomes ancestraux a permi d’infĂ©rer 5150 rĂ©arrangements chromosomiques passĂ©s. Nous avons montrĂ© que selon les clades considĂ©rĂ©s, les gĂ©nomes Ă©voluent plutĂŽt par inversion ou par translocation et que les rĂ©arrangements chromosomiques et les mutations non-synonymes s’accumulent Ă  un rythme coordonnĂ© au cours de l’évolution. La seconde approche a consistĂ© Ă  quantifier l’impact phĂ©notypique des variations structurelles (SV) du gĂ©nome en termes de taux de croissance vĂ©gĂ©tative et de viabilitĂ© mĂ©iotique chez Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nous avons dĂ©veloppĂ© une technique pour induire Ă  façon des SV ciblĂ©s dans le gĂ©nome de S. cerevisiae, en induisant deux coupures simultanĂ©es dans le gĂ©nome de S. cerevisiae avec CRISPR/Cas9 et Ă  guider la rĂ©paration des cassures par recombinaison homologue avec des oligonuclĂ©otides chimĂ©riques. Nous avons alors adaptĂ© cette technique pour induire en une Ă©tape un grand nombre de SV alĂ©atoires. L’impact phĂ©notypique des SV obtenus a Ă©tĂ© quantifiĂ© en mĂ©iose et en croissance vĂ©gĂ©tative. Ces travaux montrent que mĂȘme des rĂ©arrangements chromosomiques balancĂ©s n’affectant aucune phase codante gĂ©nĂšrent une grande diversitĂ© phĂ©notypique qui participe Ă  l’adaptation des organismes Ă  leur environnement.The aim of this work was to assess the impact of chromosomal rearrangements on the evolution of yeast genomes with two approaches. The first approach consisted in retracing past rearrangements during the evolution of Saccharomycotina yeast genomes. We have built a phylogenetic tree of 66 genomes gathered from public databases, then reconstructed the structure of all ancestral genomes of these species. By comparing the structure of reconstructed ancestral genomes, we have inferred 5150 past rearrangements. We showed that depending on the clades, genomes tend to evolve mostly by inversion or by translocation. In addition, we showed that chromosomal rearrangements and non-synonymous mutations tend to accumulate at a coordinated pace during evolution. The second approach aimed at quantifying the phenotypic impact of structural variations of chromosomes (SVs) in terms of vegetative growth and meiotic viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We developed a technique to induce easily targeted SVs in the genome of S. cerevisiae by inducing two chromosomal breaks with CRISPR/Cas9 and providing the cells with chimerical donor oligonucleotides to repair the split chromosomes by homologous recombination. We have then adapted this technique to induce multiple random SVs in a single step. The phenotypic impact of obtained variants on vegetative growth and on spore viability was quantified. These results show that even balanced chromosomal rearrangements that do not affect coding sequence generate a wide phenotypic diversity that contributes to the adaptation of organisms to their environment

    Impact phénotypique des réarrangements chromosomiques et évolution des génomes de levures

    No full text
    The aim of this work was to assess the impact of chromosomal rearrangements on the evolution of yeast genomes with two approaches. The first approach consisted in retracing past rearrangements during the evolution of Saccharomycotina yeast genomes. We have built a phylogenetic tree of 66 genomes gathered from public databases, then reconstructed the structure of all ancestral genomes of these species. By comparing the structure of reconstructed ancestral genomes, we have inferred 5150 past rearrangements. We showed that depending on the clades, genomes tend to evolve mostly by inversion or by translocation. In addition, we showed that chromosomal rearrangements and non-synonymous mutations tend to accumulate at a coordinated pace during evolution. The second approach aimed at quantifying the phenotypic impact of structural variations of chromosomes (SVs) in terms of vegetative growth and meiotic viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We developed a technique to induce easily targeted SVs in the genome of S. cerevisiae by inducing two chromosomal breaks with CRISPR/Cas9 and providing the cells with chimerical donor oligonucleotides to repair the split chromosomes by homologous recombination. We have then adapted this technique to induce multiple random SVs in a single step. The phenotypic impact of obtained variants on vegetative growth and on spore viability was quantified. These results show that even balanced chromosomal rearrangements that do not affect coding sequence generate a wide phenotypic diversity that contributes to the adaptation of organisms to their environment.Nous avons cherchĂ© Ă  Ă©valuer l’impact des rĂ©arrangements chromosomiques sur l’évolution des gĂ©nomes de levures selon deux approches. La premiĂšre approche a consistĂ© Ă  retracer les rĂ©arrangements chromosomiques au cours de l’évolution des Saccharomycotina. Nous avons construit un arbre phylogĂ©nĂ©tique Ă  partir de 66 gĂ©nomes issus de bases de donnĂ©es publiques et reconstruit la structure des gĂ©nomes ancestraux des 66 espĂšces. La comparaison des gĂ©nomes ancestraux a permi d’infĂ©rer 5150 rĂ©arrangements chromosomiques passĂ©s. Nous avons montrĂ© que selon les clades considĂ©rĂ©s, les gĂ©nomes Ă©voluent plutĂŽt par inversion ou par translocation et que les rĂ©arrangements chromosomiques et les mutations non-synonymes s’accumulent Ă  un rythme coordonnĂ© au cours de l’évolution. La seconde approche a consistĂ© Ă  quantifier l’impact phĂ©notypique des variations structurelles (SV) du gĂ©nome en termes de taux de croissance vĂ©gĂ©tative et de viabilitĂ© mĂ©iotique chez Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nous avons dĂ©veloppĂ© une technique pour induire Ă  façon des SV ciblĂ©s dans le gĂ©nome de S. cerevisiae, en induisant deux coupures simultanĂ©es dans le gĂ©nome de S. cerevisiae avec CRISPR/Cas9 et Ă  guider la rĂ©paration des cassures par recombinaison homologue avec des oligonuclĂ©otides chimĂ©riques. Nous avons alors adaptĂ© cette technique pour induire en une Ă©tape un grand nombre de SV alĂ©atoires. L’impact phĂ©notypique des SV obtenus a Ă©tĂ© quantifiĂ© en mĂ©iose et en croissance vĂ©gĂ©tative. Ces travaux montrent que mĂȘme des rĂ©arrangements chromosomiques balancĂ©s n’affectant aucune phase codante gĂ©nĂšrent une grande diversitĂ© phĂ©notypique qui participe Ă  l’adaptation des organismes Ă  leur environnement

    Reshuffling yeast chromosomes with CRISPR/ Cas9

    No full text
    International audienceGenome engineering is a powerful approach to study how chromosomal architecture impacts phenotypes. However, quantifying the fitness impact of translocations independently from the confounding effect of base substitutions has so far remained challenging. We report a novel application of the CRISPR/Cas9 technology allowing to generate with high efficiency both uniquely targeted and multiple concomitant reciprocal translocations in the yeast genome. Targeted translocations are constructed by inducing two double-strand breaks on different chromosomes and forcing the trans-chromosomal repair through homologous recombination by chimerical donor DNAs. Multiple translocations are generated from the induction of several DSBs in LTR repeated sequences and promoting repair using endogenous uncut LTR copies as template. All engineered translocations are markerless and scarless. Targeted translocations are produced at base pair resolution and can be sequentially generated one after the other. Multiple translocations result in a large diversity of karyotypes and are associated in many instances with the formation of unanticipated segmental duplications. To test the phenotypic impact of translocations, we first recapitulated in a lab strain the SSU1/ECM34 translocation providing increased sulphite resistance to wine isolates. Surprisingly, the same translocation in a laboratory strain resulted in decreased sulphite resistance. However, adding the repeated sequences that are present in the SSU1 promoter of the resistant wine strain induced sulphite resistance in the lab strain, yet to a lower level than that of the wine isolate, implying that additional polymorphisms also contribute to the phenotype. These findings illustrate the advantage brought by our technique to untangle the phenotypic impacts of structural variations from confounding effects of base substitutions. Secondly, we showed that strains with multiple translocations, even those devoid of unanticipated segmental duplications, display large phenotypic diversity in a wide range of environmental conditions, showing that simply reconfiguring chromosome architecture is sufficient to provide fitness advantages in stressful growth conditions

    The evolution of the temporal program of genome replication

    Get PDF
    International audienceGenome replication is highly regulated in time and space, but the rules governing the remodeling of these programs during evolution remain largely unknown. We generated genome-wide replication timing profiles for ten Lachancea yeasts, covering a continuous evolutionary range from closely related to more divergent species. We show that replication programs primarily evolve through a highly dynamic evolutionary renewal of the cohort of active replication origins. We found that gained origins appear with low activity yet become more efficient and fire earlier as they evolutionarily age. By contrast, origins that are lost comprise the complete range of firing strength. Additionally, they preferentially occur in close vicinity to strong origins. Interestingly, despite high evolutionary turnover, active replication origins remain regularly spaced along chromosomes in all species, suggesting that origin distribution is optimized to limit large inter-origin intervals. We propose a model on the evolutionary birth, death, and conservation of active replication origins

    Heterogeneity of the GFP fitness landscape and data-driven protein design

    Get PDF
    Studies of protein fitness landscapes reveal biophysical constraints guiding protein evolution and empower prediction of functional proteins. However, generalisation of these findings is limited due to scarceness of systematic data on fitness landscapes of proteins with a defined evolutionary relationship. We characterized the fitness peaks of four orthologous fluorescent proteins with a broad range of sequence divergence. While two of the four studied fitness peaks were sharp, the other two were considerably flatter, being almost entirely free of epistatic interactions. Mutationally robust proteins, characterized by a flat fitness peak, were not optimal templates for machine-learning-driven protein design – instead, predictions were more accurate for fragile proteins with epistatic landscapes. Our work paves insights for practical application of fitness landscape heterogeneity in protein engineering
    corecore